Word abonnee en neem Beursduivel Premium
Rode planeet als pijlen grid met hoorntjes Beursduivel
Uitgebreid zoeken

Perpetuals, Steepeners Terug naar discussie overzicht

Juridische Perikelen rond SNS-onteigening.

6.953 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 201 202 203 204 205 ... 348 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  7. A1 19 mei 2021 14:41

    • A1

      Lid sinds: 08 jul 2014

      Laatste bezoek: 07 jul 2023

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 10

      Gegeven: 24

    •    Aantal posts: 110

    HAHAHA... ja ach een bonnetje meer of minder maakt toch niets uit. Tjonge jonge en deze deskundige gaan in Cassatie omdat ze geen idee hebben waarom ze in Cassatie moeten gaan. STUMPERS.
  8. forum rang 4 DaarIsDePoen 20 mei 2021 09:13

    • DaarIsDePoen

      Lid sinds: 25 feb 2012

      Laatste bezoek: 15 mei 2024

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 561

      Gegeven: 128

    •    Aantal posts: 1.364

    Ik vind het onrustwekkend dat we na een week nog steeds niet weten waarop het cassatieberoep van de minister gebaseerd is. Transparantie?
  10. forum rang 6 TonyX 20 mei 2021 10:53

    • TonyX

      Lid sinds: 26 nov 2007

      Laatste bezoek: 13 mei 2024

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 1719

      Gegeven: 611

    •    Aantal posts: 2.604

    Als je lid bent van de VEB kun je die stukken gewoon opvragen bij de VEB. Die procedeert namens jou en in die zin ben je partij. De rest is nieuwsgierigheid of je moet zo goed ingevoerd zijn dat je de technische kans op een geslaagde cassatie redelijk kunt inschatten.

    Hoekstra wil straks gewoon in de Kamer kunnen zeggen: we hebben alle rechtsmiddelen benut en uitgeput, maar helaas moeten we doen wat de rechters ons hebben opgelegd.

    Dat wederom (ook) een flink aantal burgers in dit proces gedurende 10 jaar de hen toekomende schadeloosstelling (welke deels hun pensioenaanvulling was) wordt ontzegd, is van het type toeslagen affaire schoffering.

    Wees dan als overheid een betrouwbare partij en keer alvast (deels) uit. Je hebt de bsn nummers van die mensen dus je kunt via de fiscus altijd weer terugvorderen in de zeer onwaarschijnlijke situatie dat de Hoge Raad ineens alles van tafel zou vegen en alles op nihil zou houden.

    Die kans acht ik bijzonder klein, zeker gezien de eerder uitspraak in de Hoge Raad in deze casus.
  11. forum rang 4 DaarIsDePoen 20 mei 2021 15:35

    • DaarIsDePoen

      Lid sinds: 25 feb 2012

      Laatste bezoek: 15 mei 2024

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 561

      Gegeven: 128

    •    Aantal posts: 1.364

    quote:

    objectief schreef op 20 mei 2021 09:23:

    Of je het wel of niet weet; dat gaat geen enkel verschil maken.
    Ik ben blij voor jou dat jij tevreden bent met je onwetendheid. Ik volg graag mijn zaakjes van iets dichterbij op. Dat zijn verschillende levenshoudingen en daar is niets mis mee.
  13. Marco 2019 2 juni 2021 22:48

    • Marco 2019

      Lid sinds: 12 apr 2019

      Laatste bezoek: 11 nov 2023

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 22

      Gegeven: 5

    •    Aantal posts: 44

    Foundation SOS SNS

    Dear all,
    As promised I would submit some comments on the cassation-saga.
    Not only the Dutch State but also the ‘Stichting Beheer’ (the largest shareholder and subordinated creditor) has filed a cassation-request.
    In order to understand the procedure properly, first a short remark on the essence of a cassation
    In the cassation the ‘facts’ that the judges from the Enterprise Chamber have established, can’t be challenged anymore. E.g. the verdict that in the case the Nationalization on February 1st 2013 would not have taken place, SNS would have gone bankrupt, is no longer debateable anymore. It is also not allowed to simply state e.g. that the valuation of the expropriated bonds is ‘too high’or ‘too low’.
    Technically speaking the High Council evaluates the verdict of the Enterpice Chamber on two grounds:
    a. Did the Enterprise Chamber apply the right laws?
    b. Did the Enterprise Chamber apply the laws in a right manner?
    Apart from that the High Council takes into account the way the motivation of the decision was grounded. Did the Enterpise Chamber motivate their verdict in an understandable, adequate, comprehensive and complete manner?
    The Dutch State has filed a document of more than 100 pages (!) in which they try to scutinize the report from the experts as well as the way in which the Enterprise Chamber incorporated the results into their final verdict. It is of course not possible to simply state that the figures the experts have used are incorrect (because these are considered as ‘facts’ or ‘outcomes’). However it can be argued that the assumptions, that have led to the outcomes, are ‘incorrect’, ‘not understandable’ and/or ‘badly grounded’.
    Without going into too much detail, examples of challenging the assumption are:
    a. The length of the period the liquidator takes to unwind the business (especially mortgages) and after that period sells the portfolio, but also which factor should be used to discount future cash flows (i.e. to recalculate these cash flows towards february 1 2013).
    b. Furthermore the Dutch State argues that the experts wrongly make use of case law (e.g. the DSB Bank whereby subordinated creditors revceived a compensation of 100%), because the situation of SNS is in the opinion of the Dutch State not comparable.
    c. Finally they blame the experts, because in the opinion of the Dutsch State they have judged with ‘hindsight bias’ (the financial results from SNS after february 1 2013 were very robust and this have influenced the judgement of the experts, according to the State).
    De Dutch State concludes that it is al lto arbitrary and random, badly grounded etc. and they ask the High Council to annul the verdict, which implies that the Enterprise Chamber should start áll over again’. In that case, however, the High Council would submit clues on how the expert’s report should be moderated. This will of course not take another eight years, but as you have experienced in legal cases a few years is ‘nothing’.
    The ‘Stichting Beheer’ (shareholder and subordinated creditor) complaints that the the subordinated loans they have given to SNS Bank are inadequately considered as shares, which implies that the Stichting Beheer is not entitled to any compensation. As you might recall the value of the shares is considered to be zero, while the value of the bond excluding legal interest is 75% of the nominal value, and because none of the shareholders has filed a cassation request, this outcome fort he shareholders is now final. For us, the outcome of the evaluation by the High Council is not so relevant, because any compensation for the ‘Stichting Beheer’ will hardly influence the amont available for your bonds.
    It is almost impossible to predict what the decision of the High Council will be, but my preliminary reaction is that it might be quiet easy for the High Council to set aside all the complaints, given the fact that the valuation process has been carefully carried out (in every situation it is inevitable that you must make choices), the experts have demonstrated adequate professionalism in performing their task and they appear to be really independent. Furthermore the hearing has been fair (adversarial practice). Please realize that this is only my opinion before consulting experts, so any guarantee that this will be the final outcome, can not be deployed.
    A final remark on the future of your foundation and its services seems to be relevant. When I accepted the position as chairman of this foundation at the end of January 2013, I could not have foreseen that in May 2021 we still would not have a final verdict and a proper compensation. This goes without saying alsof or all participants in your foundation. Currently we have to make a decision wether to actively participate in the cassation, which of course will require a new effort for a longer period of time. The risk that the High Council eventually will annul the verdict is still there and it is not unthinkable that it will last another 1,5-2 years untill that is clear. In the case the decision leads to an anullment, we might have to wait another few years until the final verdict from the Enterprise Chamber is submitted. However this is a dark scenario and procedures can be a lot shorter/faster. I consider this therefore as a natural moment to decide under which conditions we will enter this new set of procedures. Don’t be affraid that I will step down but I think it is a good idea to organize my thoughts on this subject and give you feedback as soon as possible. The most important factor is how the foundation could be effective as possible and have a real added value.
  14. forum rang 4 DaarIsDePoen 3 juni 2021 08:13

    • DaarIsDePoen

      Lid sinds: 25 feb 2012

      Laatste bezoek: 15 mei 2024

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 561

      Gegeven: 128

    •    Aantal posts: 1.364

    quote:

    Marco 2019 schreef op 2 juni 2021 22:48:

    Foundation SOS SNS

    Dear all,
    ...

    The Dutch State has filed a document of more than 100 pages (!) ....
    Is it possible to share that document?
  15. DirkDeNeu 3 juni 2021 09:45

    • DirkDeNeu

      Lid sinds: 24 nov 2004

      Laatste bezoek: 15 mei 2024

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 173

      Gegeven: 123

    •    Aantal posts: 1.411

    quote:

    Marco 2019 schreef op 2 juni 2021 22:48:

    Foundation SOS SNS

    Dear all,

    Which part of"Strikt vertrouwelijk (dus niet in het forum van IEX of elders plaatsen s.v.p.)" did you not understand Marco?

    Het feit dat je het door google translate haalt verandert hier volgens mij niks aan.
  19. forum rang 10 DeZwarteRidder 3 juni 2021 12:08

    • DeZwarteRidder

      Lid sinds: 29 jun 2012

      Laatste bezoek: 15 mei 2024

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 21037

      Gegeven: 9551

    •    Aantal posts: 97.170

    quote:

    Marco 2019 schreef op 3 juni 2021 12:04:

    Is there a Moderator or Administrator to ask for the deletion of the message?
    Dat heeft geen zin meer; het is al vele malen gekopieerd.
  20. forum rang 5 graham20 3 juni 2021 12:08

    • graham20

      Lid sinds: 04 mrt 2020

      Laatste bezoek: 15 mei 2024

    • Aanbevelingen

      Ontvangen: 895

      Gegeven: 705

    •    Aantal posts: 1.617

    Wel jammer dat niet is te zien of de oorspronkelijke tekst (van meneer Faas?) minder onzinnig is dan die van Google T.
6.953 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 201 202 203 204 205 ... 348 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Neem deel aan de discussie

Word nu gratis lid van Beursduivel.be

Al abonnee? Log in

Direct naar Forum

Zoek alfabetisch op forum

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
Forum # Topics # Posts
Aalberts 465 6.846
AB InBev 2 5.296
Abionyx Pharma 2 29
Ablynx 43 13.356
ABN AMRO 1.580 46.828
ABO-Group 1 19
Acacia Pharma 9 24.692
Accell Group 151 4.129
Accentis 2 253
Accsys Technologies 22 9.015
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC 218 11.686
Ackermans & van Haaren 1 160
ADMA Biologics 1 32
Adomos 1 126
AdUX 2 457
Adyen 13 16.571
Aedifica 2 832
Aegon 3.257 320.228
AFC Ajax 537 7.025
Affimed NV 2 5.773
ageas 5.843 109.782
Agfa-Gevaert 13 1.887
Ahold 3.536 74.008
Air France - KLM 1.024 34.374
Airspray 511 1.258
Akka Technologies 1 18
AkzoNobel 466 12.778
Alfen 12 16.789
Allfunds Group 3 1.226
Almunda Professionals (vh Novisource) 651 4.247
Alpha Pro Tech 1 17
Alphabet Inc. 1 340
Altice 106 51.196
Alumexx ((Voorheen Phelix (voorheen Inverko)) 8.485 114.770
AM 228 684
Amarin Corporation 1 133
Amerikaanse aandelen 3.821 240.446
AMG 965 126.403
AMS 3 73
Amsterdam Commodities 303 6.525
AMT Holding 199 7.047
Anavex Life Sciences Corp 2 383
Antonov 22.632 153.605
Aperam 91 14.180
Apollo Alternative Assets 1 17
Apple 5 322
Arcadis 251 8.627
Arcelor Mittal 2.024 318.740
Archos 1 1
Arcona Property Fund 1 267
arGEN-X 15 9.175
Aroundtown SA 1 183
Arrowhead Research 5 9.303
Ascencio 1 20
ASIT biotech 2 697
ASMI 4.107 37.746
ASML 1.762 77.400
ASR Nederland 18 4.161
ATAI Life Sciences 1 7
Atenor Group 1 333
Athlon Group 121 176
Atrium European Real Estate 2 199
Auplata 1 55
Avantium 29 10.725
Axsome Therapeutics 1 177
Azelis Group 1 49
Azerion 7 2.681

Beleggingsideeën van onze partners

Macro & Bedrijfsagenda

  1. 16 mei

    1. NL werkloosheid april
    2. Aegon Q1-cijfers
    3. Vastned Q1-cijfers
    4. Deutsche Telekom Q1-cijfers
    5. KBC Q1-cijfers
    6. Siemens Q2-cijfers
    7. ArcelorMittal $0,25 ex-dividend
    8. IMCD €2,24 ex-dividend
    9. Shell $0,344 ex-dividend
    10. Unilever €0,4268 ex-dividend
de volitaliteit verwacht indicator betekend: Market moving event/hoge(re) volatiliteit verwacht
Naar de hele agenda